Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
6 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
n/a
n/a
41 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2019
n/a
n/a
3 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2019
n/a
n/a
8 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2019
6.6 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2018
Motivation:
The Review process appeared to be rather smooth. There was a small delay in the last round ("Decision in Progress" status for some days), but overall the experience was very good.
3.0 weeks
3.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2018
Motivation:
One reviewer was positive and constructive, but the other reviewer apart from being rude, did not seemed to be familiar with technical details of similar published studies and also inquired about details which were explicitly stated in the submitted manuscript. Editor was helpful.
5.6 weeks
5.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2017
8.4 weeks
8.4 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Rejected
2017
6.9 weeks
6.9 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Rejected
2016
Motivation:
Neuroimage (NI) is arguably the top journal in the area of Neuroimaging. Although my proposed methodology was appreciated, the writing style was suggested for further improvement. I didn't see any strong negative comments from the reviewers. I guess NI is focused on maintaining a very high rejection rate.
4.3 weeks
4.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2014