Reviews for "Neural Plasticity"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Neural Plasticity 12.9
weeks
12.9
weeks
n/a 1 3
(good)
3
(good)
Rejected
Motivation: Actual review process was only initiated after inquiring after the manuscript's status 2 months after submission. Academic editor was not aware of submission, possibly due to bug in relatively new submission system (according to editor).
Process required a lot of self-initiative but replies were usually prompt and to the point.

Neural Plasticity 4.4
weeks
7.0
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: Topic-wise, the assigned academic editor was highly suitable for the manuscript, which probably facilitated the finding of suitable reviewers. All requested changes were to the point and easily realizable. Very prompt communication.