Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
12.9 weeks
12.9 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3
3
Rejected
2020
Motivation: Actual review process was only initiated after inquiring after the manuscript's status 2 months after submission. Academic editor was not aware of submission, possibly due to bug in relatively new submission system (according to editor).
Process required a lot of self-initiative but replies were usually prompt and to the point.

4.4 weeks
7.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
2020
Motivation: Topic-wise, the assigned academic editor was highly suitable for the manuscript, which probably facilitated the finding of suitable reviewers. All requested changes were to the point and easily realizable. Very prompt communication.