Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
34.7 weeks
34.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
1
2
Rejected
2020
Motivation: One of the reviewers, who evidently did not take the trouble to read the text properly, advised rejection. It was also evident that this person was not competent enough regarding the topic. The other reviewer suggested that the manuscript be revised and this reviewer was also very clear about the relevance of the contribution. The suggested changes were also not too major so that I could have sent a revision in reasonable time. Still, the editors in charge decided that the manuscript should not be published, allegedly "in accordance with" the reviews.