Reviews for "Nature Physics"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Nature Physics n/a n/a 2.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Nature Physics n/a n/a 17.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Nature Physics 11.4
weeks
11.4
weeks
n/a 3 0
(very bad)
0
(very bad)
Rejected
Nature Physics n/a n/a 12.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: The manuscript does not demonstrate the sort of clear conceptual advance with broader implications that would demand the attention of a wider audience of physicists
Nature Physics n/a n/a 2.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Nature Physics n/a n/a 10.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Nature Physics 1.7
weeks
7.4
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Nature Physics n/a n/a 9.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: I believe that this work should be published in Nature Physics, because the problem discussed there had general, not specific, character. Nevertheless it was rejected without reviewing. Eventually it has been accepted to APL in spite the fact that it contained criticism of the editors and reviewers of this journal who had accepted earlier an article containing incorrect results, and our comment was devoted just to this issue. The latter is said solely to point out the nobleness and fairness of the Editor of APL.