Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
17 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2023
Motivation:
The editor mentioned that it might be more suitable for another journal with more focused aim.
n/a
n/a
76 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2022
Motivation:
The journal editor noted that the journal was short-staffed, which resulted in the long processing time.
7.1 weeks
7.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2022
Motivation:
The editor took 3-4 weeks of initial decision time before sending it to reviewers, which is a bit slow. While the Reviewers were fair, given this journal's high reputation I would have expected at least 3 reports to begin with, as well as a higher report quality than I've experienced elsewhere (which was not really the case).
2.7 weeks
2.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2020
n/a
n/a
11 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2019
n/a
n/a
4 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
n/a
n/a
7 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2017
n/a
n/a
8 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2014
n/a
n/a
2 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
Motivation:
Quick responce! Rejected within 3 days. Do did not have to waste time!
17.4 weeks
20.4 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Accepted
2015
9.4 weeks
12.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2014