Reviews for "Nature Geoscience"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
Nature Geoscience 4.6
weeks
14.3
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2019
Motivation: The review process and editorial handling was far superior to many encountered. There was some delay in receiving the final decision after revision. The online proofing system did not work and there was some inflexibility in handling the proof corrections but overall a very positive experience.
Nature Geoscience n/a n/a 33.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2019
Motivation: The delay, ~1 month, for rejection was disappointingly long.
Nature Geoscience n/a n/a 27.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2019
Motivation: The desk rejection time is disappointingly long.
Nature Geoscience n/a n/a 8.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2019
Nature Geoscience n/a n/a 33.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2018
Motivation: User-friendly submission portal, but a disappointingly long waiting time to hear something back from the editor (33 days).
Nature Geoscience n/a n/a 5.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2017
Nature Geoscience n/a n/a 6.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2018
Motivation: Editor's comments were strange. I am even not sure that this editor has read the whole paper.
Nature Geoscience n/a n/a 17.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2018
Nature Geoscience n/a n/a 2.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2017
Nature Geoscience n/a n/a 8.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2017
Motivation: Editor copy/pasted a line from summary in conciliatory decision letter. Suggested we publish in Nature Communications (which has $6K article processing fee).
Nature Geoscience n/a n/a 7.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2016
Nature Geoscience n/a n/a 2.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2016
Nature Geoscience n/a n/a 0.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2015
Nature Geoscience n/a n/a 4.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2013
Nature Geoscience 9.7
weeks
9.7
weeks
n/a 0 n/a 1
(bad)
Rejected 2014
Nature Geoscience n/a n/a 7.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2016
Nature Geoscience n/a n/a 8.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2016
Nature Geoscience n/a n/a 4.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2015
Motivation: Clearly, the editor read the paper and made sound comments.