Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
7 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
n/a
n/a
6 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2021
Motivation: "Significant and interesting findings but unfortunately not significant enough for this journal" Quite a lengthy and detailed reply from the editor. They suggested going to Nature communications
n/a
n/a
6 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2021
n/a
n/a
7 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2021
7.3 weeks
21.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
2019
n/a
n/a
4 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
Motivation: Quick rejection with a short, but understandable reasoning.
n/a
n/a
8 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2017
Motivation: Not enough of a conceptual advance for a broad readership
n/a
n/a
6 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
Motivation: While the response that we received from the journal was pretty prompt, there were no specific reasons provided for rejection. Upon going through the entire letter we realized that the editors had not even read the paper and possibly rejected it either just from the abstract or due to pure neglect.
n/a
n/a
11 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
Motivation: After presubmission and invited full submission they did not send the manuscript to external reviewers