Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
5.3 weeks
6.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2025
Motivation:
Think more and write, will definitely help.
n/a
n/a
14 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2021
Motivation:
Transfer to Nanoscale Advances another Nanoscale family journal with Golden open access was offered.
n/a
n/a
12 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
56.6 weeks
56.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2019
Motivation:
Swift peer-review process and response by the journal editorial office. The constructive suggestions provided by the reviewers have definitely helped to improve the quality of the manuscript.
6.4 weeks
6.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2019
1.7 weeks
1.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2019
Motivation:
Very quick editorial decision. The reviewe were also quick and insightful.
n/a
n/a
9 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
Motivation:
Way too long for immediate rejection
4.7 weeks
8.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2018
Motivation:
They took more time than expected time to accept the revised manuscript.
n/a
n/a
6 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
7.7 weeks
8.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2018
Motivation:
First review round was slow. 2 Reviewer had an opposite opinion. Mansuscript was sent to a third reviewer.
After first round the manusscript handling was smooth.
After first round the manusscript handling was smooth.
5.4 weeks
6.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2017
n/a
n/a
11 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
n/a
n/a
5 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2017