Reviews for "Nanoscale"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
Nanoscale 56.6
weeks
56.6
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2019
Motivation: Swift peer-review process and response by the journal editorial office. The constructive suggestions provided by the reviewers have definitely helped to improve the quality of the manuscript.
Nanoscale 6.4
weeks
6.4
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2019
Nanoscale 1.7
weeks
1.9
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2019
Motivation: Very quick editorial decision. The reviewe were also quick and insightful.
Nanoscale n/a n/a 9.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2018
Motivation: Way too long for immediate rejection
Nanoscale 4.7
weeks
8.0
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Accepted 2018
Motivation: They took more time than expected time to accept the revised manuscript.
Nanoscale n/a n/a 6.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2018
Nanoscale 7.7
weeks
8.9
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
3
(good)
Accepted 2018
Motivation: First review round was slow. 2 Reviewer had an opposite opinion. Mansuscript was sent to a third reviewer.
After first round the manusscript handling was smooth.
Nanoscale 5.4
weeks
6.0
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2017
Nanoscale n/a n/a 11.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2018
Nanoscale n/a n/a 5.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2017