Reviews for "Nano Letters"

Review this journal Show journal page
Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
Nano Letters n/a n/a 2.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2021
Nano Letters 3.9
weeks		 7.1
weeks		 n/a 3 2
(moderate)		 3
(good)		 Accepted 2021
Nano Letters n/a n/a 2.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2020
Nano Letters 2.4
weeks		 2.4
weeks		 n/a 3 4
(very good)		 2
(moderate)		 Rejected 2020
Nano Letters 2.9
weeks		 5.4
weeks		 n/a 2 5
(excellent)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted 2020
Nano Letters 5.0
weeks		 5.0
weeks		 n/a 2 4
(very good)		 4
(very good)		 Rejected 2020
Nano Letters n/a n/a 14.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2019
Motivation: Rather long time for a desk rejection, a transfer offer was given
Nano Letters n/a n/a 12.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2018
Nano Letters n/a n/a 30.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2018
Nano Letters 5.6
weeks		 9.3
weeks		 n/a 3 4
(very good)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted 2017
Nano Letters n/a n/a 21.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2017
Motivation: There were two different papers submitted. In both cases the time the editors took was about 3 weeks.
In my opinion this is a bit too much time for "immidiate" rejection of a 4 pages letter.
Nano Letters n/a n/a 19.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2017
Nano Letters n/a n/a 9.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2016
Motivation: Fast editorial turnaround. We felt the editors' reasons for rejecting were not unreasonable.
Nano Letters n/a n/a 8.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2016
Nano Letters n/a n/a 11.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2013