Reviews for "Nano Letters"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Nano Letters n/a n/a 14.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Rather long time for a desk rejection, a transfer offer was given
Nano Letters n/a n/a 12.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Nano Letters n/a n/a 30.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Nano Letters 5.6
weeks
9.3
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Nano Letters n/a n/a 21.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: There were two different papers submitted. In both cases the time the editors took was about 3 weeks.
In my opinion this is a bit too much time for "immidiate" rejection of a 4 pages letter.
Nano Letters n/a n/a 19.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Nano Letters n/a n/a 9.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Fast editorial turnaround. We felt the editors' reasons for rejecting were not unreasonable.
Nano Letters n/a n/a 8.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Nano Letters n/a n/a 11.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)