Reviews for "Multimedia Tools and Applications"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Multimedia Tools and Applications 17.0
weeks
17.0
weeks
n/a 2 1
(bad)
3
(good)
Rejected
Motivation: The review time was really long. What made it worse was that the reviews did not seem to be coming from someone who read the paper thoroughly and understood it. It seemed like the reviewers did not spend enough time on the paper.
Multimedia Tools and Applications 40.4
weeks
73.4
weeks
n/a 5 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Multimedia Tools and Applications 19.6
weeks
21.1
weeks
n/a 6 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Multimedia Tools and Applications 20.9
weeks
34.9
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Multimedia Tools and Applications 8.1
weeks
15.6
weeks
n/a 6 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Multimedia Tools and Applications 8.7
weeks
17.4
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: Fair and well conducted process. Constructive comments by reviewers. Some reviewers claim were not well supported.