Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
7.7 weeks
13.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
4
Accepted
2022
Motivation: The reviews were respectful, thoughtful, and improved the manuscript. It was also much appreciated that the editor was involved in the review process, pointing out which reviewer comments were a priority. My only critique is that the review rounds (especially the first one) were relatively long. However, this may have been due to the summer holiday period.
3.0 weeks
3.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2015