Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
9.0 weeks
23.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2025
Motivation:
Review comments were reasonable (N.B., there was a comment surrounding language and use of grammar, although it could not easily corroborated upon re-reading the manuscript). Editorial handling was excellent (e.g., editor quickly responded and apologized for a delay to the second round of reviews). Timeline was pretty reasonable compared to many other journals that are of a similar standing.