Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
Drawn back before first editorial decision after 44.0 days
Drawn back
2026
21.7 weeks
21.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
1
Rejected
2023
6.0 weeks
13.4 weeks
n/a
6 reports
4
4
Accepted
2023
Motivation: The review quality is great. The editorial office and editors are helpful. Six reviewers are simply too much.
n/a
n/a
52 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2024
3.3 weeks
6.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2024
6.9 weeks
16.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
2023
Motivation: I was initially very happy with the quick turn-around and the three high quality reviews. Unfortunately, the process took a bit longer eventually (e.g., the paper was sent out to one of the reviewers for a third time because of a typo).
n/a
n/a
12 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2022
n/a
n/a
1 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2022
n/a
n/a
5 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2021
31.3 weeks
31.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
1
Rejected
2019
4.7 weeks
11.0 weeks
n/a
6 reports
5
5
Accepted
2017
0.6 weeks
0.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Rejected
2017
n/a
n/a
14 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2014
n/a
n/a
20 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
14.6 weeks
18.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3
2
Accepted
2015
Motivation: The reviews were quick, but twice, after the reviewers submitted their reviews the first and second time around to the editor, it took the editor about 4 weeks to get back to us with a decision, despite this being only a short commentary. This was somewhat surprising.