Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
6.9 weeks
16.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
2023
Motivation: I was initially very happy with the quick turn-around and the three high quality reviews. Unfortunately, the process took a bit longer eventually (e.g., the paper was sent out to one of the reviewers for a third time because of a typo).
n/a
n/a
12 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2022
n/a
n/a
1 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2022
n/a
n/a
5 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2021
31.3 weeks
31.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
1
Rejected
2019
4.7 weeks
11.0 weeks
n/a
6 reports
5
5
Accepted
2017
0.6 weeks
0.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Rejected
2017
n/a
n/a
14 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2014
n/a
n/a
20 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
14.6 weeks
18.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3
2
Accepted
2015
Motivation: The reviews were quick, but twice, after the reviewers submitted their reviews the first and second time around to the editor, it took the editor about 4 weeks to get back to us with a decision, despite this being only a short commentary. This was somewhat surprising.