Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
7 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
Motivation:
After our careful reading and team discussion, unfortunately we are not seeing your manuscript as a strong candidate for MP and thus can not recommend it for external peer reviews.
n/a
n/a
8 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
Motivation:
The editor said that they would not consider our study for a full research article since our study is totally computational and on the topic of genomics.
n/a
n/a
10 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
Motivation:
After a 10 day review, the MS was rejected on the basis of a lack of mechanistic data. No other feedback was provided and therefore, the entire process was not very helpful.