Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
11.3 weeks
11.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2025
Motivation:
While it was disappointing to get a rejection after 3 months in review, the reviews were high quality and improved the manuscript. The reviewers acknowledged the potential in the manuscript as-is but given the scope of edits recommended rejection
n/a
n/a
18 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2024
12.0 weeks
22.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2021
5.0 weeks
6.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2012
Motivation:
The review process was above average for efficiency of submission and the length of time necessary to obtain a set of reviews. The reviews themselves were the typical mixed bag. After revision, the manuscript was promptly re-reviewed. In all, a reasonable process from submission to acceptance.
10.0 weeks
12.1 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Accepted
2012
Motivation:
Excellent communication. Good reviews. Great editorial work