Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
6.0 weeks
8.0 weeks
n/a
4 reports
3
5
Accepted
2016
5.0 weeks
14.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
4
Accepted
2016
8.4 weeks
9.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
4
Accepted
2012
5.7 weeks
12.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
2015
Motivation: The editorial process and the choice of reviewers was very good. The reviewers were picky but fair. The editor seemed interested and always rather in favor of the authors. The editorial process post-acception was fast and efficient.