Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
11.1 weeks
11.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2020
Motivation: The review process was rigorous. Two reviewer was assigned. One was very easy to convince. The other was very tough and provided significant improvement to the paper. Three rounds of review were needed for the acceptance of the manuscript. The editor was very helpful. Overall the experience was nice with this journal.