Reviews for "Micro and Nano Letters"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Micro and Nano Letters 11.1
weeks
11.1
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: The review process was rigorous. Two reviewer was assigned. One was very easy to convince. The other was very tough and provided significant improvement to the paper. Three rounds of review were needed for the acceptance of the manuscript. The editor was very helpful. Overall the experience was nice with this journal.