Reviews for "Methods in Ecology and Evolution"

Review this journal Show journal page
Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Methods in Ecology and Evolution n/a n/a 1.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: I felt the article was rejected really quickly (less than 1day), and based on the critics made by the Editor, it seemed that the article was not properly read.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution n/a n/a 18.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5.1
weeks		 10.4
weeks		 n/a 2 4
(very good)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
Motivation: Very fast handling overall, despite two thorough rounds of reviews (which helped to improve the manuscript considerably). Always a pleasant communication with different members of the editorial office.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution n/a n/a 60.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Sixty days for an abstract-based rejection
Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6.6
weeks		 6.6
weeks		 n/a 4 3
(good)		 5
(excellent)		 Rejected
Motivation: The manuscript was processed very quickly and efficiently. The editor gave a detailed reply justifying why he rejected the paper and did encourage us to resubmit the paper if we decided to expand it into a larger research paper.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution n/a n/a 22.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Pretty slow to reject without review.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution n/a n/a 53.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: The decision of lack of fit (a single phrase) took so long (7.6 weeks).
Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4.4
weeks		 4.4
weeks		 n/a 2 4
(very good)		 3
(good)		 Rejected