Reviews for "Methods in Ecology and Evolution"

Journal title	Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page)	1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome
Methods in Ecology and Evolution	5.1 weeks	10.4 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	5 (excellent)	Accepted
Methods in Ecology and Evolution	Motivation: Very fast handling overall, despite two thorough rounds of reviews (which helped to improve the manuscript considerably). Always a pleasant communication with different members of the editorial office.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution	n/a	n/a	60.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)
Methods in Ecology and Evolution	Motivation: Sixty days for an abstract-based rejection
Methods in Ecology and Evolution	6.6 weeks	6.6 weeks	n/a	4	3 (good)	5 (excellent)	Rejected
Methods in Ecology and Evolution	Motivation: The manuscript was processed very quickly and efficiently. The editor gave a detailed reply justifying why he rejected the paper and did encourage us to resubmit the paper if we decided to expand it into a larger research paper.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution	n/a	n/a	22.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)
Methods in Ecology and Evolution	Motivation: Pretty slow to reject without review.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution	n/a	n/a	53.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)
Methods in Ecology and Evolution	Motivation: The decision of lack of fit (a single phrase) took so long (7.6 weeks).
Methods in Ecology and Evolution	4.4 weeks	4.4 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	3 (good)	Rejected