Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
14.7 weeks
17.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2022
Motivation: Smooth review process, with constructive feedback from the editor and the reviewers that significantly improved the paper
n/a
n/a
1 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
Motivation: I felt the article was rejected really quickly (less than 1day), and based on the critics made by the Editor, it seemed that the article was not properly read.
n/a
n/a
18 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
5.1 weeks
10.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
2018
Motivation: Very fast handling overall, despite two thorough rounds of reviews (which helped to improve the manuscript considerably). Always a pleasant communication with different members of the editorial office.
n/a
n/a
60 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2019
Motivation: Sixty days for an abstract-based rejection
6.6 weeks
6.6 weeks
n/a
4 reports
3
5
Rejected
2018
Motivation: The manuscript was processed very quickly and efficiently. The editor gave a detailed reply justifying why he rejected the paper and did encourage us to resubmit the paper if we decided to expand it into a larger research paper.
n/a
n/a
22 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2017
Motivation: Pretty slow to reject without review.
n/a
n/a
53 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
Motivation: The decision of lack of fit (a single phrase) took so long (7.6 weeks).
4.4 weeks
4.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
3
Rejected
2016