Reviews for "Methods in Ecology and Evolution"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution | n/a | n/a | 18.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution | 5.1 weeks |
10.4 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
Motivation: Very fast handling overall, despite two thorough rounds of reviews (which helped to improve the manuscript considerably). Always a pleasant communication with different members of the editorial office. | |||||||
Methods in Ecology and Evolution | n/a | n/a | 60.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Motivation: Sixty days for an abstract-based rejection | |||||||
Methods in Ecology and Evolution | 6.6 weeks |
6.6 weeks |
n/a | 4 | 3 (good) |
5 (excellent) |
Rejected |
Motivation: The manuscript was processed very quickly and efficiently. The editor gave a detailed reply justifying why he rejected the paper and did encourage us to resubmit the paper if we decided to expand it into a larger research paper. | |||||||
Methods in Ecology and Evolution | n/a | n/a | 22.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Motivation: Pretty slow to reject without review. | |||||||
Methods in Ecology and Evolution | n/a | n/a | 53.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Motivation: The decision of lack of fit (a single phrase) took so long (7.6 weeks). | |||||||
Methods in Ecology and Evolution | 4.4 weeks |
4.4 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
3 (good) |
Rejected |