Reviews for "Medical Hypotheses"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
n/a n/a 48.0
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2021
Motivation: The Journal rejected the manuscript because was not able tp find reviewers
n/a 0 n/a 5
Accepted 2016
Motivation: This is the second time I submitted the paper to this journal and the decision was "accept".
The main issue is that the scope of the journal is very specific and authors should stick strictly to the requirements. If manuscript is well written, pre-edited (in our case it was needed) by native English-speaker and is interesting enough, there are high chances to be published. We have a very positive experience with this journal, but we invested a lot of time and effort to prepare the manuscript in "proper way". Good luck!
n/a n/a 21.0
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2013