Reviews for "Medical Education"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
n/a n/a 1.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2020
Motivation: very quick editorial turn around. despite not being what we had hoped for, we appreciated the efficient handling
17.4
weeks
17.4
weeks
n/a 3 0
(very bad)
0
(very bad)
Drawn back 2014
Motivation: Medical Education is a highly regarded journal based in the UK. While the journal surely receives a high volume of submissions, reviews are incredibly questionable. I have submitted six articles to this journal in the past and each time I felt as though my work was reviewed by persons with minimal knowledge of the subject area. Three of the six papers I submitted were accepted for publication, but the incredibly poor quality peer-reviews and apparent editorial "napping" made the process so miserable that I simply withdrew two of the three accepted papers and never followed up. I have never had this type of strange, and negative, experience with any other journal.