Reviews for "MDPI Sensors"

Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
3.0 weeks
3.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2019
Motivation: The review process was fast and thorough. Reviewers' suggestions helped to improve the clarity of the paper. The editor agreed to a 3-week delay for submitting the revisions when I was on holidays.
1.3 weeks
1.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
5
Accepted
2019
Motivation: The review process was extremely fast, the communication with the editor was excellent. The content of the reviews was helpful, not just for this paper, but also for the further research.
4.4 weeks
5.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2015