Reviews for "Mathematische Annalen"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
Mathematische Annalen n/a n/a 1.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2018
Mathematische Annalen 1.0
weeks
1.0
weeks
n/a 0 n/a 3
(good)
Rejected 2017
Mathematische Annalen 25.1
weeks
25.1
weeks
n/a 1 3
(good)
3
(good)
Rejected 2017
Mathematische Annalen n/a n/a 1.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2016
Mathematische Annalen 52.7
weeks
52.7
weeks
n/a 0 n/a 0
(very bad)
Rejected 2014
Motivation: I feel that waiting over one year for a rejection and not getting a review is not appropriate.
Mathematische Annalen n/a n/a 55.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2015
Motivation: The selected editor waited more than 50 days before even accepting to be editor. No specific comments were made on the papers
Mathematische Annalen 24.7
weeks
24.7
weeks
n/a 1 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2013
Mathematische Annalen 10.0
weeks
10.0
weeks
n/a 1 2
(moderate)
3
(good)
Rejected 2013
Motivation: The review was inconsistent in its outlook and poorly expressed. It should have been sent to a second reviewer.
Mathematische Annalen 8.7
weeks
13.0
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2010
Mathematische Annalen 39.1
weeks
39.1
weeks
n/a 0 n/a 5
(excellent)
Accepted 2011
Motivation: Positive experience in every respect:
- completely acceptable duration of the refereeing process for a journal of this quality (a little less than 9 months)
- Mathematische Annalen tries to keep their authors informed: we received an acknowledgement of receipt on the day of submission, we were informed immediately after the referee report was received, and just a few days later we were told about the final acceptance.