Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
6.9 weeks
14.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2020
5.7 weeks
7.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2015
18.2 weeks
20.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2018
Motivation:
The editor's expert manner and the scientific high quality comments from the reviewers indicate the quality of this journal. Though at the beginning it took two months for assigning the editor, which was due to editorial board changes, the rest of the peer review process was fast and smooth.
21.4 weeks
22.4 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
The overall rating of the review process is very good due to the duration of the review and to the selection of the Reviewers, that showed expertise in the fieldof my paper.