Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
10.9 weeks
16.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
3
Accepted
2019
Motivation: I have not received suitable reviews in the first round. The second round review was better but there were not many changes for my manuscript in the second round.
8.0 weeks
10.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
5
Accepted
2019
Motivation: The comments of the reviewer is of high quqlity. Actually I needed to use all data I saved for the second part of the paper focusing on different properties because the reviewer was interested in those. The comments of the reviewer was kind of difficult ones. But, I could revise the paper without much efforts because I already had many of the data.
n/a
n/a
0 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
n/a
n/a
3 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
13.7 weeks
14.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3
4
Accepted
2015