Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
0.6 weeks
0.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2021
Motivation:
The journal is in moderate quality range with 2.5 Citescore. Article were handled by only two reviewers in which one accepted with mild suggestions and other rejected with detailed error points which I am also agree in some part but most part can be easily corrected. I got rejection 31st of December around 8 weeks later of initial submission, and editor chose the reject while one accepted and one rejected. I would like to wait less time for this outcome or I would send a third reviewer for final conclusion. As it is said, Geography is fate. I believe this is the reason of not getting much interest or goodwill of your hardworking.
12.0 weeks
12.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2019
5.0 weeks
7.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2019
Motivation:
The review process is reasonally quick. The comments from the reviewers make sense.
I am satisfied with the whole process.
I am satisfied with the whole process.