Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
29.9 weeks
39.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
Motivation:
Good reviews, very professional handling of the editor
26.0 weeks
26.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
Motivation:
6 month process to find out from the reviews that this is not the right fit for the journal. Other feedback was constructive, but why did it take so long?
9.1 weeks
9.1 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
9.4 weeks
21.9 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
Motivation:
The quality of the review was good. Unfortunately, it took nearly three months for the reviewer to check our revisions. I emailed the editor twice about the delay, and both times the editor replied swiftly, stating that the reviewer had been reminded. After the second reminder to the reviewer, the decision was received within two days.
8.4 weeks
8.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
8.7 weeks
9.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted