Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
26.0 weeks
26.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
2
Rejected
2025
Motivation: 6 month process to find out from the reviews that this is not the right fit for the journal. Other feedback was constructive, but why did it take so long?
9.1 weeks
9.1 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
4
Accepted
2017
9.4 weeks
21.9 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
4
Accepted
2017
Motivation: The quality of the review was good. Unfortunately, it took nearly three months for the reviewer to check our revisions. I emailed the editor twice about the delay, and both times the editor replied swiftly, stating that the reviewer had been reminded. After the second reminder to the reviewer, the decision was received within two days.
8.4 weeks
8.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2014
8.7 weeks
9.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
2014