Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
41.3 weeks
56.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
4
Accepted
2018
Motivation: Overall, the editor handled the manuscript very well. But in the first round review, i thought that the duration of peer-review was too long. Unfortunately, in the second round of peer-review, manuscript was sent out to different reviewers over the original reviewers, so new additional issues kept arise in every round. It led to the author's effort to revise the manuscript inefficient in term if time. But it is not a big deal, anything in the process sometimes do not move in the editor's favour. In generall, it is good.