Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
2.7 weeks
4.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
4
Accepted
2020
Motivation: We got 2 reviews and one of them was less detailed and the reviewer recommended to publish the paper after revision elsewhere. But second reviewer gave very thorough comments and good suggestions for revision and proofread our manuscript as well. So the editor decided to give us opportunity to revise. After major revision the manuscript was sent to the same reviewers and they had additional comments for revision. the manuscript was quickly accepted after the second revision.
n/a
n/a
10 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
Motivation: I was given the option to transfer my submission to ACS Omega, but declined the opportunity.
1.0 weeks
2.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
5
Accepted
2016
Motivation: The turn around on this paper was very very fast.
4.0 weeks
5.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
2017
7.0 weeks
8.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2019
5.4 weeks
5.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
2019
Motivation: Reviewers had fairly good knowledge about the field and raised comments that helped to improve the manuscript.
4.7 weeks
8.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
2018
7.6 weeks
7.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
4
Accepted
2018
4.3 weeks
5.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
2018
Motivation: Editor handling our manuscript was very nice. He himself reviewed the manuscript and suggested some changes, which reviewers could not figure out.
4.3 weeks
4.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
2016
Motivation: The review process was fast and the comments were easy to implement.