Reviews for "Lubrication Science"

Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome	Year
47.7 weeks	47.7 weeks	n/a	0	n/a	3 (good)	Accepted	2015
Motivation: I got my manuscript accepted without any need for revisions. However, it took 11 months for Lubrication Science to arrive to this verdict. I sent emails to the Associated Editor three times to complain about the long review duration. She would send the apologizing messages back every time.
26.0 weeks	29.0 weeks	n/a	3	4 (very good)	3 (good)	Accepted	2011
30.6 weeks	52.1 weeks	n/a	3	2 (moderate)	2 (moderate)	Accepted	2015
Motivation: It took more than half year to get the first batch of reviews. Then the second round of review involved only one reviewer, who was asking several unreasonable requests. One of them was to supply spectra, showing the absence of peaks despite our mentioning in the text that no signal was detected. Later the Editor overruled the requests of that reviewer.
7.9 weeks	14.3 weeks	n/a	3	3 (good)	4 (very good)	Accepted	2013