Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
3 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
Motivation: I submitted the article to this journal as part of a pre-exisiting special issue project it was part of - even so, it was desk rejected for not being coherent to the aims&scope - which in itself I understand but does not make much sense to me for an article already part of the special issue that had been proposed by the special issue editors.
6.4 weeks
14.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2018
Motivation: Quick review process with constructive and detailed comments.
11.0 weeks
38.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2017
Motivation: While the whole submission process took over a year this was partially due to my own delays in resubmission. The final journal article hardly resembles the initial article at all, and was dramatically improved as a result of the feedback from reviewers.