Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
16.3 weeks
64.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2017
Motivation:
For a 9-page short paper, every turn-around time took very long. Mostly the comments were not very helpful, asking very specific questions.
30.1 weeks
30.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2016
Motivation:
The paper made a pretty provocative claim, so I understand that the reviewers did not quite like it (although one reviewer was quite sympathetic). I wonder, though, why it would take more than 6 months to get reviewers for a double-spaced 12 page paper.
8.3 weeks
8.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Drawn back
2013
Motivation:
One reviewer rejected the paper because we did not cite a paper that is written in Japanese.
30.4 weeks
43.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2012