Reviews for "Linguistic Inquiry"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Linguistic Inquiry | 16.3 weeks |
64.1 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 2 (moderate) |
2 (moderate) |
Accepted |
Motivation: For a 9-page short paper, every turn-around time took very long. Mostly the comments were not very helpful, asking very specific questions. | |||||||
Linguistic Inquiry | 30.1 weeks |
30.1 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 2 (moderate) |
2 (moderate) |
Rejected |
Motivation: The paper made a pretty provocative claim, so I understand that the reviewers did not quite like it (although one reviewer was quite sympathetic). I wonder, though, why it would take more than 6 months to get reviewers for a double-spaced 12 page paper. | |||||||
Linguistic Inquiry | 8.3 weeks |
8.3 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 3 (good) |
4 (very good) |
Drawn back |
Motivation: One reviewer rejected the paper because we did not cite a paper that is written in Japanese. | |||||||
Linguistic Inquiry | 30.4 weeks |
43.4 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 2 (moderate) |
0 (very bad) |
Rejected |