Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
7 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2019
Motivation: The editor provided timely, highly engaged, and very constructive comments to help develop our paper before welcoming a second attempt at submission.
5.3 weeks
5.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
4
Rejected
2019
Motivation: The comments from reviewers were detailed, constructive, and very thoughtful. The reviewers all showed great interest in the topic and seemed invested in improving the paper. They provided tips for various theoretical perspectives on the paper's topic and also gave recommendations of helpful references that all served to guide us on how the paper can be improved for future submission attempts.