Reviews for "Language Learning"

Review this journal Show journal page
Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Language Learning 9.7
weeks		 23.9
weeks		 n/a 3 4
(very good)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted
Motivation: The reviews were relevant, detailed and insightful. I believe our manuscript is improved as a result of the review processes. The journal editors were helpful, and available. The editorials decisions were quickly made.
Language Learning 7.1
weeks		 13.4
weeks		 n/a 3 5
(excellent)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
Motivation: This journal provides excellent, professional, insightful, and critical comments and suggestions for the author and also handles the manuscript in a very efficient way. The author really appreciates all the time and effort of the reviewers and editors.
Language Learning 11.7
weeks		 37.3
weeks		 n/a 4 4
(very good)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
Motivation: This journal has very high (and meticulous) standards for publication. I hope other journals follow suit.
Language Learning 10.9
weeks		 23.1
weeks		 n/a 3 4
(very good)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
Motivation: Compared to review processes at other journals, the editor was more in contact with us during this submission, informing us about the progress of the reviews and explaining a small delay. The review process felt thorough, with constructive, useful comments both by the editor and reviewers. Overall, a very positive experience. Critical, constructive, and therefore helpful in improving the paper but respectful and friendly tone, and the editor was very fast in responding to questions.
Language Learning 12.6
weeks		 32.6
weeks		 n/a 3 4
(very good)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted
Motivation: The reviews of the external editors were of overall high quality. Moreover, the additional comments by the editor who summarized the reviewers´ comments and added comments of her own were very helpful and detailed, and helped to fine-tune the manuscript. Finally, we always received rapid and friendly answers to all of our questions during the editorial process.
Language Learning 8.0
weeks		 16.3
weeks		 n/a 3 4
(very good)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
Motivation: Very thorough review process. The editor was very helpful, taking care to read reviews carefully and advising on the best way to approach the required revisions.
Language Learning 7.0
weeks		 7.7
weeks		 n/a 3 4
(very good)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
Motivation: Quick turnaround compared to other journals in the field, particularly considering the allowed length of the ms (up to 10k words). Handling editor didn't just forward the reviews as is sometimes the case, but had clearly read both the ms and the reviews and pointed out which suggestions to prioritise. Handling editor was also quick to respond to a follow-up question of mine.
Language Learning 13.0
weeks		 26.0
weeks		 n/a 3 5
(excellent)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
Motivation: My experience with Language Learning was the best. The feedback from the reviewers and especially from the editor were very helpful
Language Learning 10.8
weeks		 10.8
weeks		 n/a 4 4
(very good)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted
Motivation: Very efficient process throughout. Editor offered many detailed suggestions for improving the final draft.