Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
16.6 weeks
16.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Rejected
2024
Motivation: For me, the entire peer review process took too long. Although the paper was ultimately rejected, the suggestions from two of the three reviewers provided inspiration and were helpful for the subsequent revision of my paper.
9.7 weeks
17.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
2020
Motivation: Precise and justified decisions, timely review, quality review reports, sensible comments from the reviewers, and logical acceptance of the revision.
The only limitation (but not linked to the review process) in my opinion is the strict word limit and the time to publication after being accepted (but they are in a process of improving the time to publication).