Reviews for "Langmuir"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Langmuir 3.7
weeks
3.9
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: The review process was fast and efficient.
Langmuir 2.7
weeks
8.6
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: I could not believe when I held two lengthy reviewers' reports in my hands within less than three weeks after submission. The revision was drawn out somewhat by the birth of my daughter, and the second viewing took the reviewers a bit longer. However, the entire process was fast, efficient, of high quality, and agreeable.
Langmuir 8.7
weeks
9.3
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Langmuir 4.0
weeks
4.4
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Langmuir 4.3
weeks
8.6
weeks
n/a 5 2
(moderate)
1
(bad)
Rejected
Motivation: The reviewers, at least one of them wanted to reject the paper from the beginning, and he/she attached very much to this idea and consequently followed that. The review was filled alway: i feel that, i feel those thing - nothing objective. It seems pure competition and in that situation he/she had the right to act on this very much.