Reviews for "Langmuir"

Review this journal Show journal page
Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
4.9
weeks		 4.9
weeks		 n/a 3 4
(very good)		 4
(very good)		 Drawn back 2021
4.0
weeks		 6.0
weeks		 n/a 2 5
(excellent)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted 2022
Motivation: Very professional, very fast turnaround time. I was very impressed.
10.0
weeks		 14.0
weeks		 n/a 3 4
(very good)		 3
(good)		 Accepted 2019
3.7
weeks		 3.9
weeks		 n/a 2 3
(good)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted 2015
Motivation: The review process was fast and efficient.
2.7
weeks		 8.6
weeks		 n/a 2 4
(very good)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted 2013
Motivation: I could not believe when I held two lengthy reviewers' reports in my hands within less than three weeks after submission. The revision was drawn out somewhat by the birth of my daughter, and the second viewing took the reviewers a bit longer. However, the entire process was fast, efficient, of high quality, and agreeable.
8.7
weeks		 9.3
weeks		 n/a 2 5
(excellent)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted 2016
4.0
weeks		 4.4
weeks		 n/a 3 5
(excellent)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted 2015
4.3
weeks		 8.6
weeks		 n/a 5 2
(moderate)		 1
(bad)		 Rejected 2010
Motivation: The reviewers, at least one of them wanted to reject the paper from the beginning, and he/she attached very much to this idea and consequently followed that. The review was filled alway: i feel that, i feel those thing - nothing objective. It seems pure competition and in that situation he/she had the right to act on this very much.