Reviews for "Kyklos"

Review this journal Show journal page
Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Kyklos n/a n/a 1.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: The editorial process was very fast. The editors provided a one-page, general but to-the-point and constructive assessment.
Kyklos n/a n/a 10.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Kyklos n/a n/a 3.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Kyklos 1.7
weeks		 9.0
weeks		 n/a 2 4
(very good)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
Motivation: The editorial team and reviewers moved very swiftly and my guess is that they could do so because the paper and journal offered a very good fit. They have a reputation for the type of articles I submitted and reviewers were quite well informed.
Kyklos n/a n/a 2.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: To be honest, this is the most specific and constructive rejection letter I have ever seen. Kyklos editor introduced some papers in my research field, even gave summary and links. Furthermore, editor even recommended me specialized journal to submit my paper. Really appreciate that efforts ! Guide author very clearly and further the research, VERY HELPFUL!
Kyklos 18.3
weeks		 18.3
weeks		 n/a 3 3
(good)		 4
(very good)		 Rejected
Motivation: The reviews were fair, but were very much oriented towards mainstream economiics.
Kyklos 6.9
weeks		 15.0
weeks		 n/a 2 5
(excellent)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
Motivation: Quick and transparent process; comments from referees and editor were very helpful to improve the paper
Kyklos 26.0
weeks		 47.7
weeks		 n/a 2 4
(very good)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted
Motivation: The reviews were generally good taking into account that the paper was highly specialised. I feel that one of the proposed changes was unnecessary
Kyklos n/a n/a 14.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)