Reviews for "Knowledge-Based Systems"

Journal title	Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page)	1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome
Knowledge-Based Systems	n/a	n/a	70.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)
Knowledge-Based Systems	Motivation: Worst journal and editorial team. They rejected my manuscript after two month because they found similarity with another paper: the preprint version of the same manuscript at arxiv!!! They didn't realize this even though it was allowed in Guide For Authors.
Knowledge-Based Systems	19.0 weeks	19.0 weeks	n/a	2	1 (bad)	1 (bad)	Rejected
Knowledge-Based Systems	Motivation: I contacted the associate editor 5 times and the editor-in-chief twice, during the review process, but I didn't get a response. The peer-review process and quality were poor and irresponsible.
Knowledge-Based Systems	5.1 weeks	47.3 weeks	n/a	4	3 (good)	0 (very bad)	Rejected
Knowledge-Based Systems	Motivation: The editor-in-chief adds reviewers until she believes she can justify the rejection that she has already decided on beforehand. The decision to reject was made even though almost all reviewers accepted the changes. I contacted the editor-in-chief twice, once during the review process and once after, but I didn't get a response on either occasion.
Knowledge-Based Systems	17.1 weeks	17.1 weeks	n/a	1	1 (bad)	1 (bad)	Rejected
Knowledge-Based Systems	Motivation: Very poor peer review process indeed.
Knowledge-Based Systems	n/a	n/a	27.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)