Reviews for "Judgment and Decision Making"
| Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
| Judgment and Decision Making | n/a | n/a | 0.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
| Judgment and Decision Making | 2.6 weeks |
2.6 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 5 (excellent) |
5 (excellent) |
Rejected |
| Motivation: We got two excellent reviews in just a few weeks. Reviewers suggested major changes in the manuscript: splitting it into two smaller papers - one theoretical which is not yet ready, and one methodological brief report. We followed these suggestions. | |||||||
| Judgment and Decision Making | n/a | n/a | 4.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
| Motivation: Jonathan Baron reviews all submissions very thoroughly before sending them out to reviewers or rejecting them. He gives great comments and puts a lot of effort into his work. | |||||||