Reviews for "Journals of Gerontology, Series B"

Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
42 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2019
12.6 weeks
17.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
4
Accepted
2020
8.1 weeks
12.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
2021
Motivation: Good experience this time and every other time I have submitted to this journal.
6.1 weeks
11.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
2021
Motivation: It was for a special covid issue. Reviewers were fast and fair. Overall good process as have been my previous experiences with this journal.
10.1 weeks
10.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
4
Rejected
2020
Motivation: The manuscript was submitted during the COVID pandemic but was still processed and returned relatively quickly. Although the editor and reviewers appeared to see promise in the manuscript, it was rejected with the editor suggesting that we rewrite the paper and resubmit it to the journal as a new submission. It was not clear why we were not granted an option to revise and resubmit.
5.6 weeks
12.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
2
Rejected
2019
Motivation: Discrepancies among reviewers were quite obvious and the word-limits did not allow comprehensive articulation.
5.7 weeks
22.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
2019
Motivation: First time I had a paper accepted by a Q1 journal. took a while but highly recommend
6.3 weeks
19.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
2018
Motivation: The review process was handled very professionally. Good quality reviewers that helped improve the manuscript substantially.
7.3 weeks
14.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2016