Reviews for "Journals of Gerontology, Series B"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Journals of Gerontology, Series B 5.6
weeks
12.6
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
2
(moderate)
Rejected
Motivation: Discrepancies among reviewers were quite obvious and the word-limits did not allow comprehensive articulation.
Journals of Gerontology, Series B 5.7
weeks
22.9
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: First time I had a paper accepted by a Q1 journal. took a while but highly recommend
Journals of Gerontology, Series B 6.3
weeks
19.9
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: The review process was handled very professionally. Good quality reviewers that helped improve the manuscript substantially.
Journals of Gerontology, Series B 7.3
weeks
14.3
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted