Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
4.3 weeks
13.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
Motivation:
The handling editor was very professional: the process was smooth and the reviewers provided critical suggestions to improve my work. I find the whole process very satisfactory.
n/a
n/a
42 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
12.6 weeks
17.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
8.1 weeks
12.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
Motivation:
Good experience this time and every other time I have submitted to this journal.
6.1 weeks
11.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
Motivation:
It was for a special covid issue. Reviewers were fast and fair. Overall good process as have been my previous experiences with this journal.
10.1 weeks
10.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
Motivation:
The manuscript was submitted during the COVID pandemic but was still processed and returned relatively quickly. Although the editor and reviewers appeared to see promise in the manuscript, it was rejected with the editor suggesting that we rewrite the paper and resubmit it to the journal as a new submission. It was not clear why we were not granted an option to revise and resubmit.
5.6 weeks
12.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
Motivation:
Discrepancies among reviewers were quite obvious and the word-limits did not allow comprehensive articulation.
5.7 weeks
22.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
Motivation:
First time I had a paper accepted by a Q1 journal. took a while but highly recommend
6.3 weeks
19.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
Motivation:
The review process was handled very professionally. Good quality reviewers that helped improve the manuscript substantially.
7.3 weeks
14.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted