Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
6.7 weeks
12.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2026
Motivation:
The review process was remarkably fast, especially given the current challenges with journal reviews in general. The reviewers were highly professional throughout. One reviewer was more demanding regarding the content, but once we explained that there was no more room to incorporate all their requested changes, they were understanding about it. Overall, this was a swift and professional review experience.
10.7 weeks
16.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2023
Motivation:
Very speedy reviewing process with constructive feedback. The first two reviews were very different, I assume a third reviewer (or editor) was asked to weigh in on the reviewing process which provided more insights. The article was definitely improved by the reviewing process.