Reviews for "Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
15.6
weeks
29.7
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2017
Motivation: In addition to the external reviewers, we also received helpful comments from the Associate Editor and the Editor (I did not count them as reviewers). I have submitted to this journal in the past and the turnaround time and quality of reviews have greatly improved in the last decade.