Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
22.7 weeks
22.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
Motivation:
The manuscript was rejected after the second round of review. One reviewer was accepted but the second one is looking only at English. Elsevier journals have a problem in that their reviewers stick to language. Paper belongs to the compression of the image and the reviewer had no knowledge about the coding efficiency or coding complexity. Paper was written as a single author by me.
I am disappointed with the Elsevier journals.
I am disappointed with the Elsevier journals.
11.1 weeks
24.1 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
6.9 weeks
17.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
8.5 weeks
8.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
Motivation:
A very quick review and publishing process. An unedited article version was available online 9 days after acceptance, final version 2 weeks later.