Reviews for "Journal of Vegetation Science"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
9.0
weeks
22.7
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
3
(good)
Accepted 2021
9.0
weeks
15.0
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
1
(bad)
Rejected 2013
Motivation: The handling editor did not do a good job. After the first review round we were informed that basically only layout/formatting/style had to be changed. However, after the second round the manuscript was rejected because the editor had now realized that the study had, according to her/him, major flaws.
7.0
weeks
9.0
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2013
Motivation: Great job by the handling editor. A bit slow during the first round but incredible fast during the second round. The handling editor also improved the text a lot.