Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
18.0 weeks
18.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2017
Motivation:
The review process as speedy and transparent. The quality of the reviews were mixed, one of them could have been more specific. Just one reviewer advised to reject the paper.
60.8 weeks
86.8 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
The journal switched associate editors after my initial submission, and I honestly think my manuscript got lost in the process. After I pestered, there was a flurry of activity and reviewers were assigned. Six months later I pestered again, then another flurry of activity and reviews were submitted. Same story for the revised submission.
23.1 weeks
44.8 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2013
Motivation:
Very consistent reviews which made the manuscript improve.