Reviews for "Journal of Transport Geography"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Journal of Transport Geography | 18.0 weeks |
18.0 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 2 (moderate) |
4 (very good) |
Rejected |
Motivation: The review process as speedy and transparent. The quality of the reviews were mixed, one of them could have been more specific. Just one reviewer advised to reject the paper. | |||||||
Journal of Transport Geography | 60.8 weeks |
86.8 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
1 (bad) |
Accepted |
Motivation: The journal switched associate editors after my initial submission, and I honestly think my manuscript got lost in the process. After I pestered, there was a flurry of activity and reviewers were assigned. Six months later I pestered again, then another flurry of activity and reviews were submitted. Same story for the revised submission. | |||||||
Journal of Transport Geography | 23.1 weeks |
44.8 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
Motivation: Very consistent reviews which made the manuscript improve. |