Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
33.6 weeks
33.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2017
Motivation:
It was a short note for which I received some quite useful feedback with the acceptance.
7.1 weeks
7.1 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2016
Motivation:
The journal editor was prompt and courteous, and the review process was particular speedy—less than 2 month, which is almost unheard of in the guild. The review was on the brief side and not particularly conducive to meaningful revisions (more along the lines of comments rather than concrete suggestions), but still helpful. A downside of the publishing (rather than the review) process is the fact that the journal has only two issues per year, so the pipeline is incredibly long (it can take up to 1.5 yrs for an article to appear).