Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.1 weeks
4.6 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Accepted
2022
Motivation:
Fast review process. Reviewers were celarly experts in the field and the comments were constructive. Responsive production staff. My second publication here and will submit again.
n/a
n/a
2 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2022
9.6 weeks
10.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2020
8.7 weeks
32.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2016
Motivation:
I think that the former and the current EIC's are excellent. The problem is that some reviewers of this journal are not hat I would call "top-notch" in terms of awareness to novelty in the field. But overall, I view this journal very highly after 3 papers there and I will definitely continue publishing there
8.0 weeks
8.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2015
12.4 weeks
13.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2014