Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Motivation: The manuscript was previously reviewed by another same-tier journal. They rejected it but had offered more positive feedback and constructive comments. On the contrary, JAIS was not offering comments that might help improving the manuscript.
Motivation: Overall, the reviews were fair and highlighted some aspects of the paper that could be improved in order to make it stronger. However, while the senior editor and one of the reviewers were fair in their comments and assessment of the paper, the other reviewer was unduly harsh and critical.