Reviews for "Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 7.7
weeks
7.7
weeks
n/a 2 2
(moderate)
4
(very good)
Rejected
Motivation: Quick. Very keen on formalities (APA-Style). It seemed to me that both reviewers were not theory- and research-oriented, but rather practitioners who did not value the theoretical focus of the submitted paper.
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 9.1
weeks
9.1
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
2
(moderate)
Rejected
Motivation: The reviewers' comments are quite constructive. None of these reviewers pointed out any fatal mistakes, and the editor agreed the mentioned issues are addressable. However, the editor still rejected my paper. It was very disappointing. It may be partially related to their existing good ranking, which makes the editors picky on these borderline submissions.
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 15.4
weeks
28.9
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
0
(very bad)
Rejected
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology n/a n/a 45.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)