Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
7.7 weeks
7.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
4
Rejected
2021
Motivation: Quick. Very keen on formalities (APA-Style). It seemed to me that both reviewers were not theory- and research-oriented, but rather practitioners who did not value the theoretical focus of the submitted paper.
9.1 weeks
9.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
2
Rejected
2021
Motivation: The reviewers' comments are quite constructive. None of these reviewers pointed out any fatal mistakes, and the editor agreed the mentioned issues are addressable. However, the editor still rejected my paper. It was very disappointing. It may be partially related to their existing good ranking, which makes the editors picky on these borderline submissions.
15.4 weeks
28.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
0
Rejected
2020
n/a
n/a
45 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018