Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
6.0 weeks
10.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
Comments by reviewers but also by the editor, who summarized the main points in need of improvement for me. This was helpful.
17.4 weeks
17.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2012
Motivation:
Very professional editorial team and very easy to work with. The peer reviewers were quite helpful. This journal does a great job.