Reviews for "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2.0 weeks |
2.0 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 3 (good) |
3 (good) |
Rejected |
Motivation: JASA-EL (before being spun off from JASA, I don't know about the policy now) does not permit major revisions. The reviewers noted several items that may or may not be important, but overall they did not appreciate the concept described in the manuscript. | |||||||
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | n/a | n/a | 14.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Motivation: It seems that it took a bit long to send the manuscript to an associate editor (2 weeks). However, the associate editor was really fast about it. | |||||||
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 19.0 weeks |
20.6 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
Motivation: The first turn-around time was a bit long, but once I revised the paper, the editor accepted the paper without sending it back to the reviewers. That certainly expedited the process. | |||||||
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 10.4 weeks |
10.4 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
3 (good) |
Rejected |
Motivation: The submission was for Express Letters category. I am disappointed that the decision was reject, but the reviews were fair. I revised the paper for a different journal which is more descriptively oriented, and it was eventually accepted. |